American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
ISSN (Print): 2328-4056 ISSN (Online): 2328-4064 Website: Editor-in-chief: Maysaa El Sayed Zaki
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology. 2014, 2(4), 81-85
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-2-4-2
Open AccessArticle

Frozen Retail Poultry Meat Contact Surfaces as Sources of Salmonella and Escherichia Coli Contamination in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Dr OLAYINKA Ishola1, and ADEYANJU Gladys Taiwo1

1Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

Pub. Date: October 07, 2014

Cite this paper:
Dr OLAYINKA Ishola and ADEYANJU Gladys Taiwo. Frozen Retail Poultry Meat Contact Surfaces as Sources of Salmonella and Escherichia Coli Contamination in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology. 2014; 2(4):81-85. doi: 10.12691/ajidm-2-4-2


Food contact surfaces serve as sources of food contamination. These contact surfaces if not properly washed are additional sources of foodborne pathogens predisposing to foodborne illnesses. Of importance is contact surfaces of raw unprocessed meat. Contact surfaces from which frozen poultry meat are been sold in Bodija and Academy areas of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria, comprising wooden tables, weighing scales and cutting knives, were assayed to access levels of contamination with preference to Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. Microbiological Standards and Guidelines by USDA (National Agricultural library) and NCCLS guidelines (from Global Salm-Surv, 2003) were used during the research work. Statistical software SPSS for Windows was used for statistical analysis (SPSS Inc., 1992). The study was approved by the Ethical Research Review Board (ERRB), University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. Forty-two swab samples were randomly taken from contact surface materials, fourteen each of wooden tables, knives and weighing scales used in retail sales of poultry meat. From the forty-two (42) swab samples collected, log mean cfu/cm2 ± SD of Aerobic Plate Count was at 7.78 ± 0.35 while for Enterobacteriaceae counts, it was at 7.65 ± 0.33. ISO 6579: 2002 was used for Salmonella isolation and ISO-16654:2001 for Escherichia coli isolation. Fifteen (15) Salmonella isolates were obtained comprising ten (10) from knives at 23.8%, five (5) from weighing scales at 11.9% and non (0) from wooden tables (0%) while sixteen (16) Escherichiacoli isolates, eight from (8) knives,five from (5) scales and three from (3) wooden tables, at 7.1%, 19% and 11.9% were respectively obtained. The reflection of the work is that these meat contact surface materials will serve as further sources of cross contamination if not properly cleaned before use.

food contamination poultry meat contact surfaces cross contamination Enterobacteriaceae Escherichia coli Salmonella spp.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  American Public Health Association, 1992. Compendium of methods for the microbial examination of foods. 3rd rev. ed. C. Vanderzant and D.F. Splittstoesser, Washington, USA.
[2]  Clarence S.Y, Obinna C.N, Shalom N. C. 2009.Assessment of bacteriological quality of ready to eat food (Meat pie) in Benin City metropolis, Nigeria. Afr. J. Microb. Res. 3(6), 390-395.
[3]  Costerton J.W., Stewart P.S, Greenberg E.P., 1999. Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections Science 284: 1318-1322.
[4]  Encyclopedia of Public Health 2011. E. Coli.
[5]  European Commission (2001) In: The cleaning and disinfection of knives in the meat and poultry industry.
[6]  ERRB (Ethical Research Review Board) (2011) Research Management Office, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
[7]  Evans, J.A., Russel, S.L., James, C., Corry, J.E.L., 2004. Microbiological contamination of food refrigeration equipment. J. Food Eng. 62: 225-232.
[8]  Global Salm-Surv (2003) In: Rene S (ed) A global Salmonella surveillance and laboratory support project of the World Health Organization. Laboratory Protocols Level 1 Training Course: Isolation of Salmonella, 4th edn., Hendriksen, pp 3-6,11,13,15,17.
[9]  Gorman R, Bloomfield S, Adley C.C 2002. A study of cross-contamination of food-borne pathogens in the domestic kitchen in the Republic of Ireland.Int J Food Microbiol 76: 143-150.
[10]  Hassan A.N, Amber F, Adnan K, Ameera Y. K. and Shahana U.K 2010.Microbial contamination ofraw meat and its environment in retail shops in Karachi, Pakistan. J Infect DevCtries2010; 4(6):382-388. Pg.384-386.
[11]  ISO Standards catalogue 07.100.30 (2011) Food Microbiology.
[12]  Magnus P. 1981.Meat Composition. Food Science and Technology, 4th edition. Gohumunary Pub., London, pp. 108-215.
[13]  Mulder R.W. 1999. Hygiene during transport, slaughter and processing. In: Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Science Symposium Series (Richardson and Mead eds).Vol.25. pp. 277-285.
[14]  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, (NIAID) 2011. E. coli overview.
[15]  NSW Food Authourity (2011) In: NSW Retail Meat Food Safety Program, NSW/FA/FI024/1109. Pages 7, 14,16,20, 26,27,31,32.
[16]  Panisello PJ, Rooney R, Quantick PC, Stanwell-Smith R.,2000.Application of foodborne disease outbreak data in the development and maintenance of HACCP systems.Int J Food Microbiol 59: 221-234
[17]  SPSS/PC+, 1992. Base System User's Guide. Version 5.0. SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA.
[18]  Thiruppathi S, Abdulla M. H., Dorairaj S., Sangeetha S. and Perumalsamy L.,2004.Salmonella Cross-contamination in Retail Chicken Outlets and the Efficacy of Spice Extracts on Salmonella enteritidis Growth Inhibition on Various Surfaces.Microbes and Environments, Vol.19, No. 4 pp.286-291.
[19]  USDA, National Agricultural library (2011) Microbiological Standards and Guidelines.,
[20]  WHO (2010) ”Laboratory Protocol “. In: Isolation of Salmonella spp. From Food and Animal Faeces ” 5th Ed. June 2010. Pages 4-8,13.