Changes in Sensory and Quality Characteristics of S. Aethiopicum (Shum) and A. Lividus (Linn) Leafy Vegetables along the Supply Chain

Apolot Mary Gorret¹, Joshua Ssozi¹, Agnes Namutebi¹, Michael Masanza², Kizito Elizabeth², Deborah Rees³ and Acham Hedwig^1,

¹Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Makerere University, Kampala-Uganda

²Department of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Uganda Christian University (UCU), Mukono, Uganda

³Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, UK

Cite this paper:
Apolot Mary Gorret, Joshua Ssozi, Agnes Namutebi, Michael Masanza, Kizito Elizabeth, Deborah Rees and Acham Hedwig. Changes in Sensory and Quality Characteristics of S. Aethiopicum (Shum) and A. Lividus (Linn) Leafy Vegetables along the Supply Chain. American Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2018; 6(4):161-166. doi: 10.12691/ajfst-6-4-5

Abstract

Changes in sensory attributes of vegetables over time under different conditions have been reported, however, little has been done regarding profiling and assessing changes in sensory attributes of raw leafy vegetables particularly Solanum aethiopicum (S.) and Amaranthus lividus (L.). This study therefore fills an important knowledge gap of profiling sensory attributes and assessing changes in color, texture and appearance of S.aethiopicum and A.lividus leafy vegetables over time after harvest. A complete randomized design in a 3 ×3 factorial arrangement (each vegetable sample was subjected to three treatments (Time of the day) and three replicates) and data was collected by use of quantitative descriptive sensory analysis. Descriptive data was entered into Microsoft excel spread sheets, averages computed and graphs generated. The data was further subjected to ANOVA and a least significant difference test was used to compare means of samples for all attributes at 95% confidence interval. Correlation analysis using Statistical Package for Social Scientients’ (SPSS version 16.0) was also performed to assess relationship between sensory attributes. Descriptive sensory analysis results showed that all 9:00hrs samples were rated highly for each attribute compared to the 12:00hrs and 15:00hrs samples. ANOVA results for S. aethiopicum showed statistical significant (p<0.05) difference for all the attributes except for light green color of leaf stalk (p<0.05) whereas that for A. lividus showed significant differences for moist appearance, well spread appearance, smoothness and overall quality. Correlation results showed significant positive relationship (p<0.05) among attributes. This study observed that sensory attributes of leafy vegetables change with time after harvest andtraders are therefore encouraged to adopt local cooling systems to help preserve the sensory attributes of vegetables.

Keywords:
sensory attributes profiling time after harvest deterioration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Hussin, S.R, Yee, W.F and Bojei, J. Essential quality attributes in fresh producepurchased by Malaysian consumers . Journal of Agribusiness Marketing, 3, 1-19, 2010
[2]	Oliveira, D. C. R. D., Leal, P. A. M., Honório, S. L. and Soares, E. K. B. Sensory quality attributes of lettuce obtained using different harvesting performance systems. Food Science and Technology (Campinas), 33(2), 239-244, 2013
[3]	Martinez, I., Ares G. and Lema P. Influence of cut and packaging film on sensory quality of fresh-cut Butterhead Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L., cv.Wang). Journal of Food Quality, 31, 48-66, 2008.
[4]	Ali, A., Chow, W. L., Zahid, N. and Ong, M. K. Efficacy of Propolis and Cinnamon Oil Coating in Controlling Post-Harvest Anthracnose and Quality of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) during Cold Storage. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7, 2742-2748, 2014.
[5]	Alvarez, M. V., Ponce, A. G. and Moreira, M. R. Combined effect of bioactive compounds and storage temperature on sensory quality and safety of minimally processed celery, leek and butternut squash. Journal of Food Safety, 35(4), 560-574, 2015
[6]	Kader, A. A. Increasing food availability by reducing postharvest losses of fresh produce. Acta Horticulturae, 682, 2169-2176, 2005.
[7]	Renna, M., Gonnella, M., Giannino, D. andSantamaria, P. Quality evaluation of cook-chilled chicory stems ( Cichorium intybus L ., Catalogna group ) by conventional and sous vide cooking methods. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture. 2013.
[8]	Piagentini, A. M., Mendez, J. C., Guemes, D. R. and Pirovani, M. E. Modeling changes of sensory attributes for individual and mixed fresh-cut leafy vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 38(3), 202-212, 2005.
[9]	Ssekabembe, C. K., Bukenya, C., & Nakyagaba, W. Traditional knowledge and practices in local vegetable production in central Uganda. In African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, 6, 14-19, 2003.
[10]	Lawless, H. T. and Heymann, H. Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. Springer Science & Business Media. 2010.
[11]	Ferreira, E. L., Lencioni, C., Benassi, M. T., Barth, M. O. and Bastos, D. H. M. Descriptive sensory analysis and acceptance of stingless bee honey. Revista de Agaroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, 15(3), 251-258, 2009.
[12]	Papetti P. andCarelli A. Composition and sensory analysis for quality evaluation of a typical Italian cheese: influence of ripening period. Czech Journal of Food Science. 31: 438-444, 2013.
[13]	Vilela, A., Monteiro, B. and Correia, E. Sensory profile of Port wines: Categorical Principal Component Analysis, an approach for sensory data treatment. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola, 30(1), 1-8, 2015.
[14]	Wrzodak, A., Kapusta, E., Szwejda-Grzybowska, J. and Woszczyk, K. Sensory quality of carrots from organic and conventional cultivation. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 77, 75-88, 2012.
[15]	Fernández-León, M. F., Fernández-León, a. M., Lozano, M., Ayuso, M. C. and González-Gómez, D. Different postharvest strategies to preserve broccoli quality during storage and shelf life: Controlled atmosphere and 1-MCP. Food Chemistry, 138, 564-573, 2013.
[16]	Leighton, C. S., Schönfeldt, H. C. and Kruger, R. Quantitative descriptive sensory analysis of five different cultivars of sweet potato to determine sensory and textural profiles. Journal of Sensory Studies, 25(1), 2-18, 2010.
[17]	Aparicio, J. P., Medina, M. A. T. and Rosales, V. L. Descriptive sensory analysis in different classes of orange juice by a robust free-choice profile method. Analytica Chimica Acta, 595(1-2), 238-247, 2007.
[18]	Ofosu, I.W., Adjei, I.A., Bah, F.B.A., Kwetey, P.N., Gloria M. Ankar-Brewoo, G.M., Oduro, I. and William., O.E. Quantitative Descriptive Sensory Analysis of the Performance of Pregelatinised Starch-Protein Admixtures as Fat Mimetic in Wheat Bread. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8 (10): 1559-1566, 2009.