American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2328-7365 ISSN (Online): 2328-7357 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajeee Editor-in-chief: Naima kaabouch
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 2019, 7(3), 55-61
DOI: 10.12691/ajeee-7-3-1
Open AccessArticle

Analyzing Handling Effects on Performance Parameters of Ethernet Cables using the Feature Selective Validation Method and Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Olusegun Ogundapo1, , Charles Nche1, Alistair Duffy2 and Gang Zhang3

1School of Information Technology and Computing, American University of Nigeria, PMB 2250, Yola-Nigeria

2School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, LE1 9BH, Leicester, United Kingdom

3School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China

Pub. Date: August 08, 2019

Cite this paper:
Olusegun Ogundapo, Charles Nche, Alistair Duffy and Gang Zhang. Analyzing Handling Effects on Performance Parameters of Ethernet Cables using the Feature Selective Validation Method and Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 2019; 7(3):55-61. doi: 10.12691/ajeee-7-3-1

Abstract

The use of Ethernet cables is a vital, if under- discussed element of the infrastructure for the internet of things (IOT). While there are many cable types on the market, one worrying trend is the wide availability of copper clad aluminum (CCA) cables, which are widely considered unsuitable for infrastructure deployment. The availability of these copper clad aluminum (CCA) cables frequently disguised as compliant Ethernet communication cables calls for a method of assessing their performance, as this is crucial to ensuring quality of service delivery. This paper presents a method of analyzing the measured return loss and impedance profile due to handling stress. In this research, four Ethernet cables of which one of them was copper CCA cable were subjected to three rounds of coiling and uncoiling tests to represent stress from handling during installation. The Feature Selective Validation (FSV) method and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) tests were used to quantify the variations between the tests. The results indicate that the CCA cable has the lowest resilience to physical stress with high potential for degradation.

Keywords:
ethernet cable feature selective validation kolmogorov-smirnov test impedance profile handling effect

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  M.Jung, C.Reinisch and W.Kastner, “Integrating Building Automation Systems and IPv6 in Internet of Things”, Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, Palermo, July 2012, pp. 683-688.
 
[2]  J. Randolph, “Introduction to Lightning and AC Power Fault Surge Protection for Telecom Signaling Cables”, IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering, Portland, November 2012, pp. 1-12.
 
[3]  C.Spurgeon and J.Zimmerman, “Ethernet: The Definitive Guide”, Second Edition, O’Reilly Media Inc., 2014.
 
[4]  D.Law, D.Dove, J.D’Ambrosia, M.Hajduczenia, M.Laubach and S.Carlson, “Evolution of Ethernet Standards in the IEEE 802.3 Working group”, IEEE Communications Magazine,Vol.51, Issue 8, August, 2013, pp. 88-96.
 
[5]  J. Stankovic, “Research Directions for the Internet of Things”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol.1, No. 1, March 2014, pp. 3-9.
 
[6]  M. Sanctis, E. Cianca, G. Araniti, I. Bisio and R. Prasad, “Satellite Communications Supporting Internet of Remote Things”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol.3, No.1, February 2016, pp. 113-123.
 
[7]  N.Bari, G.Mani and S.Berkorich, “Internet of Things as a Methodological Concept”, Fourth International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Application, San Jose, July 2013, pp. 48-55.
 
[8]  J.Jin, J.Gubbi, S.Marusic and M.Palaniswami, An Information Framework for Creating Smart City through the Internet of Things”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, January 2014, pp. 112-121.
 
[9]  R. Harmon, C. Leon and S. Bhide,“ Smart Cities and the Internet of Things”, International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, August 2015, pp. 485-494.
 
[10]  A. Al-Faqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhan and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols and Applications”,IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, Vol.17, No. 4, June 2015, pp. 2347-2376.
 
[11]  Fluke Networks: “Application Note: Copper Clad Aluminum (CCA) Cables”, [Online]. Available: http://www.flukenetworks.com/doc_links_pdf/en/content/application-note-copper-clad- aluminum-cables.
 
[12]  D.B.Kiddoo, “Update: Counterfeit and Non-Compliant Communications Cable”, 63rd International Wire and Cable Symposium, Rhode Island, USA, November 2014, pp.440- 475.
 
[13]  F. Peri, “Non-Compliant and Counterfeit Cable: A Risk Too Real to Ignore”, [Online]. Available:http://cccassoc.org/files/6314/0050/5728/CCCA- Article-on-Non-Compliant-Cable-in-ICT-Today-May-2014.pdf.
 
[14]  A.Oliviero and B.Woodward, Cabling: The Complete Guide to Copper and Fibre-Optic Networking,Fourth Edition, Wiley Publishing Inc., 2009.
 
[15]  J.Hayes and P.Rosenberg, Data,Voice, and Video Cabling,3rd Edition, Delmar Cengage Learning, 2009.
 
[16]  ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1-2002: “Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard, Part 2: Balanced Twisted Pair Cabling Components - Addendum 1: Transmission Performance Specifications for 4-pair 100-ohm Category 6 Cabling", June, 2002.
 
[17]  O. Ventosa, M. Pous, F. Silva, R. Jauregui. “Application of Feature Selective Validation Method to Pattern Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 56, No. 4, August, 2014.
 
[18]  Y. Sanchez, C. Rosi, E. Paez and M. Azpurua, “Feature Selective Validation Applied to the Comparison of Calibration Data, International Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements, Rio de Janeiro, August, 2014, pp.194-195.
 
[19]  M. Johnson, “FSV versus Human Subjective Data Evaluation; an Informal Survey”, IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Pittsburgh, August, 2012, pp. 679-684.
 
[20]  B.Archambeault and J.Diepenbrock, “Quantifying the Quality of Agreement between Simulation and Validation Data for Multiple Data Sets”, IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Florida, July, 2010, pp. 722-725.
 
[21]  R. Telleria, F. Silva, A. Orlandi, H. Sasse and A. Duufy, “Factors Influencing the Successful Validation of Transient Phenomenon Modelling”, Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Beijing, April, 2010, pp. 338-341.
 
[22]  F.J. Massey, “The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 46, No.253, March, 1951, pp.67-78.
 
[23]  G. Zhang, A. Duffy, H. Sasse, W. Lixin, “The Use of Probability Density Functions to Improve the Interpretation of FSV Results”, IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Pittsburgh, August 2012, pp. 685-689.
 
[24]  T. Kirkman, “Statistics to Use”, 1996, [Online]. Available: http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/KS-test.html.
 
[25]  “FLUKE networks: Versiv Cabling Certification Product Family User’s Manual”, [Online]. Available: http://download.flukenetworks.com/Download/Asset/9828877-c- en.pdf.