American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
ISSN (Print): 2328-398X ISSN (Online): 2328-3998 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajcea Editor-in-chief: Mohammad Arif Kamal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2018, 6(2), 68-79
DOI: 10.12691/ajcea-6-2-4
Open AccessArticle

Structural Performance of Isolated Steel Beam-to-Column Connection

Iman Faridmehr1, , Mahmood Md. Tahir1, Mohd Hanim Osman2 and Abbas Razavykia3

1UTM Construction Research Centre (CRC), Institute of Smart Infrastructures and Innovative Construction, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Johor Bahru, 81300, Malaysia

2Forensic Engineering Centre (FEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Johor Bahru, 81300, Malaysia

3Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Pub. Date: February 09, 2018

Cite this paper:
Iman Faridmehr, Mahmood Md. Tahir, Mohd Hanim Osman and Abbas Razavykia. Structural Performance of Isolated Steel Beam-to-Column Connection. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2018; 6(2):68-79. doi: 10.12691/ajcea-6-2-4

Abstract

The present study attempts to determine the main characteristics of a new proposed steel connection retrofitted by an elastomeric isolator. Its stiffness, strength, and ductility are investigated. The elastomeric isolators were designed according to the Japanese Society of Base Isolation with the aim of improving the energy dissipation of the connection. Experimental tests were conducted to evaluate the moment rotation (M-θ) curve of the proposed connection as well as of fully-rigid (SidePlate) and semi-rigid (flush end-plate) connections. The behaviour of beams with flexible and fixed-end connections was also studied by classical methods of analysis. The initial stiffness and classification index of the connections were identified by an analytical calculation in compliance with the methods suggested by Eurocode 3 Part 1-8 and ANSI/AISC 360-10. The results confirmed that the new proposed connection can be classified as a flexible connection in terms of its initial stiffness; however, it developed 90% of the plastic moment capacity of a connected beam. Besides, it showed that the isolated connection did address the AISC drift angle capacity requirement of for a special moment frame (SMF).

Keywords:
classification index beam to column connection semi-rigid moment-rotation curve

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Miller, D.K., Lessons learned from the Northridge earthquake. Engineering structures, 1998. 20(4-6): p. 249-260.
 
[2]  Nakashima, M., K. Inoue, and M. Tada, Classification of damage to steel buildings observed in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Engineering Structures, 1998. 20(4-6): p. 271-281.
 
[3]  Kartal, M., et al., Effects of semi-rigid connection on structural responses. Electronic journal of structural Engineering, 2010. 10(10): p. 22-35.
 
[4]  Valipour, H.R. and M.A. Bradford, Nonlinear P-Δ analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Steel and Composite Structures, 2013. 14(1): p. 1-20.
 
[5]  Aksoylar, N.D., A.S. Elnashai, and H. Mahmoud, The design and seismic performance of low-rise long-span frames with semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011. 67(1): p. 114-126.
 
[6]  Malley, J.O., SAC Steel Project: Summary of Phase 1 testing investigation results. Engineering structures, 1998. 20(4-6): p. 300-309.
 
[7]  Roeder, C.W. and D.A. Foutch, Experimental results for seismic resistant steel moment frame connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1996. 122(6): p. 581-588.
 
[8]  Hamburger, R.O. Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, ANSI/AISC 358-05. in Structures Congress 2006: Structural Engineering and Public Safety. 2006.
 
[9]  Venture, S.J. and G.D. Committee, Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded steel moment-frame buildings. 2000: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 
[10]  Agency, F.E.M., Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings. 2000, FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture Washington, DC.
 
[11]  Chen, C.-C. and C.-C. Lin, Seismic performance of steel beam-to-column moment connections with tapered beam flanges. Engineering Structures, 2013. 48: p. 588-601.
 
[12]  Saffari, H., A. Hedayat, and M.P. Nejad, Post-Northridge connections with slit dampers to enhance strength and ductility. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013. 80: p. 138-152.
 
[13]  Latour, M., V. Piluso, and G. Rizzano, Cyclic modeling of bolted beam-to-column connections: component approach. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2011. 15(4): p. 537-563.
 
[14]  Chou, C.C., et al., Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010. 39(1): p. 23-44.
 
[15]  WANG, Y., et al., Experimental study on beam-to-column connections with beam-end horizontal haunch of steel frame under low cyclic loading [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010. 4: p. 013.
 
[16]  Aristizabal-Ochoa, J.D., Slope-deflection equations for stability and second-order analysis of Timoshenho beam–column structures with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 2008. 30(9): p. 2517-2527.
 
[17]  Aristizabal-Ochoa, J.D., First-and second-order stiffness matrices and load vector of beam-columns with semirigid connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1997. 123(5): p. 669-678.
 
[18]  Chen, W.-F., Y. Goto, and J.R. Liew, Stability design of semi-rigid frames. Vol. 1. 1996: John Wiley & Sons.
 
[19]  Committee, A., Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10). American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago-Illinois, 2010.
 
[20]  Hsieh, S.-H. and G. Deierlein, Nonlinear analysis of three-dimensional steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Computers & structures, 1991. 41(5): p. 995-1009.
 
[21]  BS EN, B., Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures-Part 1-8: Design of joints. BS EN 1993-1, 2005. 8.
 
[22]  Latour, M., V. Piluso, and G. Rizzano, Experimental behaviour of friction Tstub beamtocolumn joints under cyclic loads. Steel Construction, 2013. 6(1): p. 11-18.
 
[23]  Gasparini, D.A., A. DebChaudhury, and L.W. Curry, Damping of frames with viscoelastic infill panels. Journal of the Structural Division, 1981. 107(5): p. 889-905.
 
[24]  Ocel, J., et al., Steel beam-column connections using shape memory alloys. Journal of Structural engineering, 2004. 130(5): p. 732-740.
 
[25]  UBC, U.B.C. Uniform building code. in Int. Conf. Building Officials. 1997.
 
[26]  Pan, P., et al., Base-isolation design practice in Japan: introduction to the post-Kobe approach. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2005. 9(01): p. 147-171.
 
[27]  Theocaris, P. and E. Marketos, Elastic-plastic analysis of perforated thin strips of a strain-hardening material. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1964. 12(6): p. 377-380.
 
[28]  Kishi, N. and W.-F. Chen, Data base of steel beam-to-column connections. 1986: Structural Engineering Area, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University.