American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
ISSN (Print): 2328-398X ISSN (Online): 2328-3998 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajcea Editor-in-chief: Mohammad Arif Kamal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2017, 5(4), 136-153
DOI: 10.12691/ajcea-5-4-2
Open AccessArticle

Building a New Urban Highway or Elevating an Old One? Finding Optimum Solution Based on Environmental Impacts

Rahil Farhani1, Seyed Navid Mashhadi Moghadam2, and Maryam Shoaei Zangir3

1Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

2Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran

3Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Art, Esfahan, Iran

Pub. Date: September 12, 2017

Cite this paper:
Rahil Farhani, Seyed Navid Mashhadi Moghadam and Maryam Shoaei Zangir. Building a New Urban Highway or Elevating an Old One? Finding Optimum Solution Based on Environmental Impacts. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2017; 5(4):136-153. doi: 10.12691/ajcea-5-4-2

Abstract

For a sustainable urban expressway development, it is necessary to conduct an EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) study. Expressway development and operation should, therefore, be planned with careful consideration of the environmental impacts. An assessment of an expressway project may include consideration of different routes as distinct alternatives. Thus, evaluating alternatives is an important step of environmental impact assessment. In this paper, some MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) models, were used for assessing alternatives in EIA in earlier studies, reviewed and a hybrid MCDM model proposed to tackle the dependency relations of evaluation criteria with aid of the fuzzy DEMATEL (decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory) method. In next step, the fuzzy DEMATEL method combined with ANP (Analytic Network Process) method to weighting criteria for assessment of alternatives with aid of the fuzzy VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method. Empirical study results illustrate the proposed model is a workable and reliable tool for evaluating alternatives of environmental impact assessment of urban expressway in order to make results much closer to reality.

Keywords:
urban expressway EIA fuzzy DEMATEL combined with ANP fuzzy VIKOR and MCDM model

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 4

References:

[1]  Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). Achieving Sustainable Development and Promoting Development Cooperation. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47.
 
[2]  Ogola, P. F. A. (2007). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT GENERAL PROCEDURES. KenGen, 2-17.
 
[3]  Overseas Environmental Cooperation Center. (2000). Environmental Impact Assessment for International Cooperation. Japan: Environment Agency of Government of Japan.
 
[4]  Lohani, B., Evans, J. W., Ludwig, H., Richard, A., & Tu, S. L. (1997). Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries in Asia (Vol. 1): Asia Development Bank.
 
[5]  Rao, S. K. (2010). Environmental Impact Assessment Guidance Manual for Highways. Hyderabad: Administrative Staff College of India.
 
[6]  Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, P. (2009). Ordinal Measurements with Interval Constraints in the EIA Process for Siting a Waste Storage Area. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, 397-413.
 
[7]  Ramanathan, R. (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management(63), 27-35.
 
[8]  Dimitrios Tsamboulas, & Mikroudis, G. (2000). EFECT_evaluation framework of environmental impacts and costs of transport initiatives. Transportation Research Part D, 283-303.
 
[9]  Robert Handfield, Steven V. Walton, Robert Sroufe, & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research(141), 70-87.
 
[10]  E. Fontela, & Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL, innovative methods: Battelle Geneva Research Institute.
 
[11]  Barrow, C. J. (1997). Environmental and social impact assessment: an introduction. London: Arnold, Hodder Headline, PLC.
 
[12]  Gilpin, A. (1995). Environmental impact assessment (EIA): cutting edge for the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
[13]  Maclean, I., Macken, K., Byrne, G., O’Mahony, T., & Archer, B. (2002). Guidelines on the information to be contained in Environmental Impact Statements. Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency,.
 
[14]  Shopley, J. B., & Fuggle, R. F. (1984). Comprehensive review of current environmental impact assessment methods and techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 18:1.
 
[15]  Beanlands, G. E., & Duinker, P. N. (1984). Ecological framework for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 18:3.
 
[16]  Brouwer, R., & Ek, R. V. (2004). Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 50, 1-21.
 
[17]  Vanclay, F., & Bronstein, D. A. (1995). Environmental and social impact assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
 
[18]  Yunhui, Q., Shuwang, W., Junqi, P., Zhifeng, L., & Hongchao, Z. Environmental Impact Assessment Method Based Synthesis Weight. National Natural Science Foundation of China.
 
[19]  Daniel, S. E., Tsoulfas, G. T., Pappis, C. P., & Rachaniotis, N. P. (2004). Aggregating and evaluating the results of different Environmental Impact Assessment methods. Ecological Indicators, 4, 125-138.
 
[20]  Hongling, Q., Suimin, M., & Xincong, Z. (2010). Environmental Impact Assessment of Artificial Aggregate Systems Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Challenges in Environmental Science and Computer Engineering, China.
 
[21]  Balasubramaniam, A., & Voulvoulis, N. (2005). The Appropriateness of Multicriteria Analyisis in Environmental Decision-Making Problems. Environmental Technology, 26(9), 951-962.
 
[22]  Boufateh, I., Perwuelz, A., Rabenasolo, B., & Jolly, A.-M. (2012). Multiple Criteria Decision Making for environmental impacts optimization. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 3(1), 28-42.
 
[23]  Broughtona, E. K., Brenta, A. C., & Haywoodc, L. (2008). APPLICATION OF A MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR DECISION-MAKING IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: THE CASE OF CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER IN SOUTH AFRICA. Energy and Environment, 23.
 
[24]  Geldermann, J., Zhang, K., & Rentz, O. (2005). Multi-criteria group decision support for integrated technique assessment. French-German Institute for Environmental Research
 
[25]  Omann, I. (2001). How can Multi-criteria Decision Analysis contribute to environmental policy making? A case study on macro-sustainability in Germany. Paper presented at the Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, Austria.
 
[26]  Rahman, M. A., Rusteberg, B., Uddin, M. S., Saada, M. A., Rabi, A., & Sauter, M. (2014). Impact Assessment and Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Alternative Managed Aquifer Recharge Strategies Based on Treated Wastewater in Northern Gaza. water, 6.
 
[27]  Sagbas, A., & Mazmanoglu, A. (2014). Use of multicriteria decision analysis to assess alternative wind power plants. Journal of Engg. Research, 2(1), 147-161.
 
[28]  Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Steevens, J., Ferguson, E., & Pleus, R. C. (2007). Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9.
 
[29]  Linkov, I., Varghese, A., & Jamil, S. (2004). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Framework for Structuring Remedial Decisions at Contaminated Sites. Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making, 15-54.
 
[30]  Wu, K., & Zhang, L. (2014). Progress in the Development of Environmental Risk Assessment as a Tool for the Decision-Making Process. Journal of Service Science and Management, 7, 131-143.
 
[31]  Boclin, A. d. S. C., & de, M. R. (2006). A decision support method for environmental impact assessment using a fuzzy logic approach. Ecological Economics, 58(1), 170-181.
 
[32]  Chang, N. B., Chen, H. W., & Ning, S. K. (2001). Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(3), 293-305.
 
[33]  Contreras, F., Hanaki, K., Aramaki, T., & Connors, S. (2008). Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 52, 979-991.
 
[34]  Liu, K. F. R., Hsu, C.-Y., Yeh, K., & Chen, C.-W. (2011). Hierarchical analytic network process and its application in environmental impact evaluation. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 28(1), 1-18.
 
[35]  Liu, K. F. R., & Lai, J. H. (2009). Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5119-5136.
 
[36]  Evans, R. (2012). Decision Making in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
 
[37]  Wang, Y.-M., Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2004). Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. European Journal of Operational Research(174).
 
[38]  Kevin F.R. Liu, & Lai, J.-H. (2009). Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications(36).
 
[39]  Carter Burgess. (2008). I-70B West Environmentla Assessment. Colorado.
 
[40]  Colorado Department of Transportation. (2006). Valley Highway - Logan to 6th Ave. Final Evnironmental Impact Statement. Colorado.
 
[41]  Economic Reconstruction Agency. (January 2012). Jammu and Kashmir Urban Sector Development Investment Program—Construction of Elevated Expressway Corridor (Flyover) from Jehangir Chowk to Rambagh and Natipora in Srinagar City (pp. 125). Kashmir.
 
[42]  Michigan Department of Transportation. (2013). US-31 Environmental Impact Statement. Michigan, USA.
 
[43]  Viet Nam Expressway Corporation. (2010). Viet Nam: GMS Ben Luc – Long Thanh Expressway Project (Multi-tranche Financing Facility) Environmental Assessment Report. Viet Nam.
 
[44]  Vietnam Expressway Corporation. (October 2011). Initial Environmental Examination for Ho Chi Minh City - Long Thanh - Dau Giay Expressway Project 2374-VIE: Ministry of Transport of VietNam.
 
[45]  Yang, Y.-P. O., Shieh, H.-M., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2013). A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Information Sciences, 232.
 
[46]  Hsu, C.-H., Wang, F.-K., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2012). The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66.
 
[47]  Chiu, W. Y., Tzeng, G. H., & Li, H. L. (2013). A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37.
 
[48]  Wang, Y.-L., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2012). Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 39.
 
[49]  Mei-Tai Chu, Joseph Shyu, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, & Khosla, R. (2007). Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications (33).
 
[50]  Ningxia Environmental Protection, Department. (December/ 2009). Environmental Impact Assessment Executive Summary. China.
 
[51]  Economic Reconstruction Agency. (2012). Jammu and Kashmir Urban Sector Development Investment Program—Construction of Elevated Expressway Corridor (Flyover) from Jehangir Chowk to Rambagh and Natipora in Srinagar City Initial Environmental Examination.
 
[52]  Modi, A., & Shinkar, N. P. (2012). Environmental Impact Assessment of Road from Ujjain to Jaora. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 1(4).
 
[53]  Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2011). An integrated fuzzy AHP–ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38.
 
[54]  Lohani, B. N., Evans, J. W., Everitt, R. R., Ludwig, H., Carpenter, R. A., & Tu, S.-L. (1997). Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries in Asia (Vol. 1): Asian Developement Bank.
 
[55]  National Highway Authority. (July 2007). Islamic Republic of Pakistan: National Trade Corridor Highway Investment Program Faisalabad-Khanewal Expressway (E-4)(184 Km) (pp. 147).
 
[56]  TRANSJAMAICAN HIGHWAY, LTD. (September, 2007). Environmental Impact Assessment Highway 2000: Phase 1B Sandy Bay to Williamsfield Km: 33+000 to 71+500. Kingston.
 
[57]  Viet Nam Expressway Corporation. (September 2010). Viet Nam: GMS Ben Luc – Long Thanh Expressway Project (Multi-tranche Financing Facility).
 
[58]  A. Felix, & Devadoss, A. V. (2014). A Fuzzy DEMATEL- Trapezoidal Structure for Modeling Cause and Effect Relationships of Youth Violence. International Journal of Computing Algorithm, 3, 474-483.
 
[59]  Javad Jassbi, Farshid Mohamadnejad, & Nasrollahzadeh, H. (2011). A Fuzzy DEMATEL framework for modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map. Expert Systems with Applications(38), 5967-5973.
 
[60]  Li Chung-Wei, & Gwo-Hshiung, T. (2009). Identification of a Threshold Value for the DEMATEL Method: Using the Maximum Mean De-Entropy Algorithm Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (pp. 789-796): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
 
[61]  Shankar Chakrabortya, & Chatterjee, P. (2013). Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data. Decision Science Letters, 2, 135-148.