American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
ISSN (Print): 2328-398X ISSN (Online): 2328-3998 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajcea Editor-in-chief: Mohammad Arif Kamal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2016, 4(5), 159-164
DOI: 10.12691/ajcea-4-5-2
Open AccessArticle

In the Eyes of the Beholder: Students’ Degree of Satisfaction with Traditional versus Suite Style Residence Halls

Azadeh Eshaghi1 and Fatemeh Khozaei1,

1Department of Architecture, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

Pub. Date: August 10, 2016

Cite this paper:
Azadeh Eshaghi and Fatemeh Khozaei. In the Eyes of the Beholder: Students’ Degree of Satisfaction with Traditional versus Suite Style Residence Halls. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2016; 4(5):159-164. doi: 10.12691/ajcea-4-5-2

Abstract

This study aims at comparing the degree of students’ satisfaction in relationship with traditional and suite style residence halls. A sample population of 209 students residing in four traditional and suite style residence halls participated in the survey from April to June 2015. The questionnaire consisted of 15 items. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 17.0 was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe some demographic information of the sample. To test the hypothesis, an independent sample t-test was used to analyze the data. Following the data analysis, a series of interviews were conducted with 20 students. The results of quantitative data showed that suite style residents were less satisfied with their housing. Analyzing the interviews revealed that even though the suit style residents had enjoyed a better design, physical condition and maintenance compared to their counterparts from the traditional residence halls, they held higher expectations about the hall environments and felt that reality were short of their expectations.

Keywords:
traditional residence halls satisfaction suite style residence halls

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  AlKandari, N. (2007). “Students' perceptions of the residence hall living environment at Kuwait University”. College Student Journal, 41(2), 327-335
 
[2]  Astin, A. W. (1973). The impact of dormitory living on students. The Educational Record, 54, 204-210.
 
[3]  Brandon, A., Hirt, J. B., & Cameron, T. (2008). Where you live influences who you know: differences in student interaction based on residence hall design. The Journal of College and University student housing 35(2), 62-79.
 
[4]  Corbett, J. A. (1973). Are the Suites the Answer? Environment and Behavior, 5(4), 413-419.
 
[5]  Holahan, C. J., & Wilcox, B. L. (1978). “Residential satisfaction and friendship formation in high and low rise student housing: an interactional analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 237-241.
 
[6]  Karlin, R. A., Rosen, L. S., & Epstein, Y. M. (1979). “Three Into Two Doesn't Go: A Follow-up on the Effects of Overcrowded Dormitory Rooms.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,, 5(3), 391-395.
 
[7]  Kaya, N., & Erkip, F. (2001). “Satisfaction in a Dormitory Building: The Effects of Floor on the Perception of Room Size and Crowding.” Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 35-53.
 
[8]  Khozaei, F., Hassan, A. S., Kodmany, K. A., & Arab, Y. (2014).” Examination of student housing preferences, their similarities and differences.” Facilities 32(11/12), 709-722.
 
[9]  Khozaei, F., Ramayah, T., Hassan, A. S., & Surienty, L. (2012). Fulfilled Preferences and Sense of Attachment to Place: The Mediating Role of Housing Satisfaction. Property management, 30(3).
 
[10]  Mandel, D. R., Baron, R. M., & Fisher, J. D. (1980). “Room Utilization and Dimensions of Density: Effects of Height and View.” Environment and Behavior, 12(3), 308-319.
 
[11]  Moos, R., & Lee, E. (1979). Comparing residence hall and independent living settings. reserach in higher education, 11(3).
 
[12]  Oliver R. L, 1977, “Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation on Postexposure Product Evaluations - an Alternative Interpretation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), p. 480.
 
[13]  Oliver R. L, 1980, “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), p. 460.
 
[14]  Pike, C. R. (2009). “The differential effects of on- and off campus living arrangements on students' openness to diversity.” NASPA journal, 46(4), 629-645.
 
[15]  Rodger, S. C., & Johnson, A. M. (2005). “The Impact of Residence Design on Freshman Outcomes: Dormitories Versus Suite-style residences.” The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(3), 83-99.
 
[16]  Stoner, K. L., & Cavins, K. M. (2003). “New Options for Financing Residence Hall Renovation and Construction.” New Directions for Student Services, 2003(101), 17-28.
 
[17]  Turley, R. N. L., & Wodtke, G. (2010). “College residence and academic performance: who benefits from living on campus?” Urban Education, 45(4), 506-532.