American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
ISSN (Print): 2328-398X ISSN (Online): 2328-3998 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajcea Editor-in-chief: Mohammad Arif Kamal
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2014, 2(2), 77-82
DOI: 10.12691/ajcea-2-2-4
Open AccessArticle

Project Control Factors at Front End: Indian Perspective

Devanshu Pandit1, and S.M. Yadav2

1Associate Professor, CEPT University, India

2Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat

Pub. Date: April 15, 2014

Cite this paper:
Devanshu Pandit and S.M. Yadav. Project Control Factors at Front End: Indian Perspective. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2014; 2(2):77-82. doi: 10.12691/ajcea-2-2-4

Abstract

The role of project control is to create a system, procedures and tools to monitor and control project delivery. The performance measurement is carried out on continuous basis and action is taken to ensure that project performance objectives are achieved. Although considerable amount of planning and organizing is required at front end, actual monitoring takes place during implementation. Poor definition of control parameters in the front end leads to poor project control brief to the other project participants namely client, consultants and contractors It is required that project control planning should start from beginning to improve the project management efficiency. The research identifies the important project control factors in the project development stage. Two brainstorming sessions resulted in identification of 18 factors that are classified into five project control areas. Analytical hierarchy process as a group decision making tool was used to make a pair-wise comparison to assign weightage to each project control group and factor. The study of weight indicates that quality (32.71%) and safety (23.64%) controls are preferred over schedule (14.74%) and cost (12.48%). Weightage derived is used to create Project Control Index (PCI). Value of PCI helps to understand the level of project controls established in the project during project development on ongoing basis. Weights and PCI guides project manager in setting and achieving project objectives.

Keywords:
project control factors quality control project success analytical hierarchy process

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Ahsan, K., & Gunawan, I. (2010). “Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects”. International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 68-78.
 
[2]  Iyer, K. C., & Jha, K. N. (2005). “Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects”. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 283-295.
 
[3]  Turner J.R, (1996) “Editorial: International Project Management Association Global Qualification, Certification and Accreditation”, International Journal of Project Management, 14 (1). pp 1-6.
 
[4]  Liu A.M.M and Walker A, (1998) “Evaluation of Project Outcomes”, Construction Management and Economics, 16, pp 209-219
 
[5]  Munns, A., & Bjeirmi, B. (1996). “The role of project management in achieving project success”. International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 81-87.
 
[6]  Dow Debbie, “Does the discipline of project controls really add value?” accessed at
 
[7]  www.icoste.org/ICMJ%20Papers/Cape%20Town-Dow.pdf‎ on 06-08-2014
 
[8]  Takim, R., & Akintoye, A. (2002). “Performance Indicators for Successful Construction Project Performance”. In U. of Northumbria (Ed.), Vol. 2, 545-55 (Vol. 2, pp. 2-4). 18th Annual ARCOM Conference.
 
[9]  Atkinson, R. (1999). “Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria”. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342.
 
[10]  Meyer C. “How the right measures help teams excel”. Harvard Business Review 1994, 95-103.
 
[11]  CURT, (2004), “Construction Project Controls: Cost, Schedule, and Change Management Construction”, Construction Users Round Table UP-201.
 
[12]  CIDC, India Country Report 2005~06, Construction Industry Development Council, India. (2006).
 
[13]  Kartam, N. (1997). “Integrating safety and health performance into construction CPM”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(JUNE), 121-126.
 
[14]  Hinze, J., & Wiegand, F. (1992). “Role of designers in construction worker safety”. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 118(4), 677-684.
 
[15]  Huang, X., & Hinze, J. (2006). “Owner’s Role in Construction Safety”. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 132(February), 164-173.
 
[16]  Burati, J. L., Farrington, J. J., & Ledbetter, W. B. (1992). “Causes of Quality Deviations in Design and Construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 34-49.
 
[17]  Jackson, J. T. (1991). “Technical specifications’ effect on construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 116(3), 463-467.
 
[18]  Arditi David, H. M. G. (1999). “Perceptions of process quality in building projects”. Journal of management in engineering, Vol. 15(2), 43-53.
 
[19]  Sidwell, T., & Dr Albert PC Chan. (2001). Framework for Measuring Success of Construction Projects, Research Program C:Construction Project Delivery Strategies (pp. 1-21). Brisbane, Australia.
 
[20]  Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2009). “Project Implementation Status Report of Central Sector Projects Costing Rs.20 crore & above”. MOPSI, New Delhi, India.
 
[21]  Construction Industry Institute (CII), (1986). “Project control for engineering”. Publication 6-1, Cost/Schedule Control Task Force, University of Texas, Austin, Tex., 9.
 
[22]  Barnes, M. (1988). “Construction project management”. International Journal of Project Management, 6(2), 69-79.
 
[23]  Akintoye, A. S., & MacLeod, M. J. (1997). “Risk analysis and management in construction”. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 31-38.
 
[24]  Ayudhya, I. N. B. (2011). “Evaluation of Common Delay Causes of Construction Projects in Singapore”. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5(11), 1027-1034.
 
[25]  Day, J., & Bobeva, M. (2005). A Generic Toolkit for the Successful Management of Delphi Studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 103-116.
 
[26]  R.Venkata Rao, S. (2007). Decision making in the manufacturing environment: using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods (2007th ed.) Springer Verlag London Ltd.
 
[27]  Farkas, A. (2010). The Use of the AHP in Civil Engineering Projects (pp. 157-169). Budapest, Hungary: 8th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking.
 
[28]  Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). “An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success”. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89-95.
 
[29]  Dalalah, D., Al-oqla, F., & Hayajneh, M. (2010). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) in Multi- Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Cranes. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 4(5), 567-578.
 
[30]  Ciptono, W. S. (2005). “Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process in Prioritization of Critical Success Factors of TQM”. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 20(3).
 
[31]  Gohar, A. S., Khanzadi, M., & Jalal, M. P. (2011). “A Fuzzy MCDM for Evaluating Risk of Construction Projects”. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 162-171.
 
[32]  Ariff, H., Salit, M. S., Ismail, N., & Nukman, Y. (2008). “Use of analytical hierarchy process (ahp) for selecting the best design concept”. Jurnal Teknologi, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia, 49(A), 1-18.
 
[33]  Okeola, O. G., & Sule, B. F. (2012). “Evaluation of management alternatives for urban water supply system using Multicriteria Decision Analysis”. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 24(1), 19-24. King Saud University.
 
[34]  Saaty, T. L. (2008). “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83.