American Journal of Applied Psychology
ISSN (Print): 2333-472X ISSN (Online): 2333-4738 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajap Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015, 3(4), 109-112
DOI: 10.12691/ajap-3-4-5
Open AccessArticle

Machiavellianism and Perceived Parental Bonding: Different Socialization Pathways for Men and Women

Béla Birkás1, , András Láng2 and Tamás Bereczkei2

1Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary

2Institute of Psychology, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary

Pub. Date: December 29, 2015

Cite this paper:
Béla Birkás, András Láng and Tamás Bereczkei. Machiavellianism and Perceived Parental Bonding: Different Socialization Pathways for Men and Women. American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015; 3(4):109-112. doi: 10.12691/ajap-3-4-5

Abstract

Machiavellianism can be seen as a personality indicator of fast life history strategy. Unpredictable, harsh environmental conditions tend to produce fast strategies which are associated with earlier maturation, more offspring, but less investment in them. Men tend to benefit more from fast strategy than women. We investigated, to what extent parental bonding characteristics play a role in developing high-Mach personality traits. According to gender differences we attempt to differentiate possible pathways of socialisation for men and women with Machiavellian attitudes. 175 participants (69 females) were asked to report Machiavellian attitudes (Mach-IV) and perceived parental rearing practices (Short-EMBU). For women, moderate negative correlation was found between level of Machiavellianism and level of parental (both paternal and maternal) warmth. For men on the other hand, Machiavellian attitudes correlated negatively with paternal rejection and paternal overprotection. Our results indicated that the development of Machiavellian attitudes followed different patterns in men and women. Considering the source of the above mentioned gender difference, we speculate that women could be more sensitive to emotional closeness of both their parents, whereas men tend to be more affected by paternal feedback or the lack of thereof. Consequently, there are gender differences in pathways that lead from family experiences to Machiavellian attitudes.

Keywords:
machiavellianism life history theory parental bonding gender differences socialization

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Christie, R. and Geis, F., Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press, New York, 1970.
 
[2]  Jonason, P.K., Lyons, M., and Bethell, E., “The making of Darth Vader: Parent-child care and the Dark Triad”, Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 30-34, September 2014.
 
[3]  Jonason, P.K., Webster, G.W., Schmitt, D.P., Li, N.P., and Crysel, L., “The antihero in popular culture: A Life History Theory of the Dark Triad”, Review of General Psychology, 16, 192-199, June 2012.
 
[4]  Láng, A. and Birkás, B., “Machiavellianism and perceived family functioning in adolescence”, Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 69-74, June 2014.
 
[5]  McDonald, M.M., Donnellan, M.B., and Navarrete, C.D., “A life history approach to understanding the Dark Triad”, Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 601-605, April 2012.
 
[6]  MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O., The theory of island geography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967.
 
[7]  Wilson, E.O., Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1975.
 
[8]  Brumbach, B.H., Figueredo, A.J., & Ellis, B.J., “Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies: a longitudinal test of an evolutionary model”, Human Nature, 20, 25-51, March 2009.
 
[9]  Rushton, J.P., “Differential K theory: the sociobiology of individual and group differences”, Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 441-452, April 1985.
 
[10]  Thornhill, R. and Palmer, C.T., “Evolutionary life history perspective on rape”, in Crawford, C. and Salmon, C. (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology, public policy, and personal decisions, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, 2004, 249-274.
 
[11]  Kaplan, H.S. and Gangestad, S.W. “Life history theory and evolutionary psychology”, in Buss, D.M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology, Wiley, New York, 2005, 68-96.
 
[12]  Ellis, B.J., Figueredo, A.J., Brumbach, B.H., and Schlomer, G.L., “Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies”, Human Nature, 20, 204-268, June 2009.
 
[13]  Jonason, P.K. and Tost, J., “I just cannot control myself: the Dark Triad and self-control”, Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 611-615, October 2010.
 
[14]  Birkás, B., Csathó, Á., Gács, B. and Bereczkei, T., “Nothing ventured nothing gained: Strong associations between reward sensitivity and two measures of Machiavellianism”, Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 112-115, February 2015.
 
[15]  Jonason, P.K., Koenig, B.L., and Tost, J., “Living a fast life: The Dark Triad and life history theory”, Human Nature, 21, 428-442, December 2010.
 
[16]  Vernon, P.A., Villani, V.C., Vickers, L.C., and Harris, J.A., “A behavioral genetics investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5”, Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 445-452, January 2008.
 
[17]  Jonason, P.K. and Webster, G.D., “A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics”, Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 521-526, March 2012.
 
[18]  Bowlby, J., A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. Routledge, London, 1988.
 
[19]  Arrindell, W.A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M., et al., “The development of a short form of the EMBU: its appraisal with students in Greece, Guetemala, Hungary and Italy”, Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 613-628, October 1999.
 
[20]  Olson, D.H., “Circumplex model of marital and family systems”, Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144-167, May 2000.
 
[21]  Patterson, G.R., A social learning approach: Vol. 3. Coercive family processes. Castalia, Eugene, OR, 1982.