American Journal of Applied Psychology
ISSN (Print): 2333-472X ISSN (Online): 2333-4738 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajap Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013, 1(2), 26-32
DOI: 10.12691/ajap-1-2-2
Open AccessArticle

Social Network Analysis and Strategic Planning: A Case Study from the Italian Local Context

Caterina Balenzano1, Anna Fausta Scardigno1, Maria Luisa Giancaspro1, Amelia Manuti1 and Vittoria Jacobone1,

1Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Communication University of Bari, Italy

Pub. Date: May 08, 2013

Cite this paper:
Caterina Balenzano, Anna Fausta Scardigno, Maria Luisa Giancaspro, Amelia Manuti and Vittoria Jacobone. Social Network Analysis and Strategic Planning: A Case Study from the Italian Local Context. American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013; 1(2):26-32. doi: 10.12691/ajap-1-2-2

Abstract

This paper analysed the relationships between the institutional and the socio-economical stakeholders involved in the process of Strategic Planning for the Broad Area - Lecce (Piano Strategico dell’Area Vasta - Lecce), aiming at defining the most adequate organizational strategies to enhance networking efficacy. Quantitative and qualitative methods have been used to collect and to analyze data. Specifically, social networks analysis and focus group discussions helped to triangulate the analysis. Results showed that intersectional integration and confrontation between the partners involved in the planning were both aspects that the participants defined crucial as to improve the strategic planning process, and to ensure a good participation level and the development of more functional communication and decision-making strategies.

Keywords:
organizational processes social network analysis strategic planning decision making strategies

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 2

References:

[1]  Morciano D, Scardigno AF, Manuti A, Pastore S (in press). An evaluation study of youth participation: a case study in Southern Italy. Educational Research for Policy and Practice.
 
[2]  O'Reilly, C. A., & Pondy, L. R. (1979). Organizational communication. In Steve Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behavior. Columbia, Ohio: Grid.
 
[3]  Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
 
[4]  Te-eni, D., (2001). Review: a cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing it. MIS Quarterly 25(2): 251-312.
 
[5]  Winograd, T., & Flores F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
 
[6]  Blau, P. M., (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York.
 
[7]  Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
 
[8]  Davis, G. F., & Powell, W. W. (1992). Organization-environment relations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 315-374). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
 
[9]  Scott, J. (1997). Social Network Analysis. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
 
[10]  Hanneman, R.A. (2001). Introduction to Social Network Methods. On line textbook.http://faculty.ucr.edu/hanneman/SOC157/TEXTIndex.html.
 
[11]  Krueger, R.A. (1988) Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage, UK.
 
[12]  Morgan, D.L. (1988) Focus Group as Qualitative Research. Sage, UK.
 
[13]  Stewart, D.W. & Shamdasani, P.N. (1990) Focus Groups: Theory and Practices. Sage, UK.
 
[14]  Parker, A., & Tritter, J., (2006). Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29 (1): 23-37
 
[15]  Abernethy, M., Horne, M., Lillis, A. M., Malina, M. A., & Selto, F.H. (2005). A multi-method approach to building causal performance maps from expert knowledge. Management Accounting Research, 16 (2): 135-155.
 
[16]  Carr, D., Schott, G., Burn, A., & Buckingham, D. (2004). Doing Game Studies: A Multi-method Approach to the Study of Textuality, Interactivity and Narrative Space. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 110: 19-30.
 
[17]  Dewhurst, F.W., & Cegarra Navarro, J.G. (2004). External communities of practice and relational capital. Learning Organization, 11(4/5): 322-331.
 
[18]  Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2002). Social Network Analysis Used for Modelling Collaboration in Distance Learning Gropus.http://lifc.univ comte.fr/RECHERCHE/P7/pub/ITS02/reffayIts.pdf.
 
[19]  Streeter, C. L., & Gillespie, D. F. (1992), Social Network Analysis. Journal of Social Service Research 16 (1/2): 201-222.
 
[20]  Bott, E. (1955). Urban families: conjugal roles and social networks, Human Relations, 8: 345-385.
 
[21]  Moreno J.L. (1934). Who will survive? Washington DC: Nerv. Ment. Dis. Publ.
 
[22]  Burt, R. (1980). Models of Network Structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6:79-14.
 
[23]  Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
 
[24]  Bertolasi, S., & Mazzoni, E., (2005). Software per analizzare le interazioni di gruppo: Cyram NetMiner e Ucinet. L’eplorazione e il confronto tra due strumenti per lo studio della Social Network Analysis, TD- Tecnologie didattiche, 35: 64-69.