American Journal of Applied Psychology
ISSN (Print): 2333-472X ISSN (Online): 2333-4738 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajap Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013, 1(3), 65-71
DOI: 10.12691/ajap-1-3-6
Open AccessArticle

Climate Change Awareness: An Explorative Study on the Discursive Construction of Ethical Consumption in a Communication Campaign

Amelia Manuti1,

1Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Communication, University of Bari, Italy

Pub. Date: December 25, 2013

Cite this paper:
Amelia Manuti. Climate Change Awareness: An Explorative Study on the Discursive Construction of Ethical Consumption in a Communication Campaign. American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013; 1(3):65-71. doi: 10.12691/ajap-1-3-6

Abstract

The recent interest of the European Commission about the issues of ethical consumption and protection of the environment carried out the creation of Climate Change Awareness Campaign. The launch of the campaign was in 2006, throughout the 25 member states to raise awareness of climate change and the positive role that citizens can play in figuring it. There are strong indications, in several countries, that many consumers are switching towards more socially and environmentally responsible products and services, reflecting a shift in consumer values. The aim of this explorative study is to investigate the discursive construction of ethical awareness which would guide actual ethical consumption behaviour with reference to a communication campaign. Indeed, though scientific literature as already pointed out the efficacy of persuasive communication in social public campaign appealing at ethical issues, little is known about what happens between the fruition of the campaign and attitude and behavioural consumption. Participants to the study, a sample of university students were asked to examine one of the videos of the Climate Change Awareness Campaign promoted and broadcast by the European Commission, as to investigate their social representation of ethical consumption, arguing that this could act as interpretative repertoire of their attitude toward ethical consumption. Focus group discussion was used as methodological tool. Main results, implication and further development were discussed.

Keywords:
critical consumption European Commission advertising persuasion

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Stamm, C., Clark, F., Reynolds Eblacas, P., (2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: the case of global warming, Public understanding Science, 9: 219-237.
 
[2]  Olausson, U., (2009). Global warming-global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty, Public Understanding Science, 18: 421-436.
 
[3]  Lewis, T., (2008). Transforming citizens? Green politics and ethical consumption on lifestyle television, Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 22 (2), 227-240.
 
[4]  Wilson, K. (1995) “Mass Media as Sources of Global Warming Knowledge,” Mass Communication Review 22(1-2): 75-89.
 
[5]  Krosnick, J., Holbrook, A. and Visser, P. (2000) “The Impact of the Fall 1997 Debate about Global Warming on American Public Opinion,” Public Understanding of Science 9(3): 239-60.
 
[6]  Corbett, J. and Durfee, J. (2004) “Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming,” Science Communication 26(2): 129-51.
 
[7]  Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). “Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process” in J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-40). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
[8]  Katz, Elihu, Jay G. Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch. “Uses and Gratifications Research.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 4th ser. 37 (1973-1974): 509-23
 
[9]  Holbert, R, Kwak, N., & Shaw, D., (2003). Environmental Concern, Patterns of Television Viewing, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Integrating Models of Media Consumption and Effects, Journal of Braodcasting and Electronic Media, 47 (2), 177-196
 
[10]  Bennett, L. (1988) News: The Politics of Illusion. New York and London: Longman.
 
[11]  Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
 
[12]  Allan, S. (1999) News Culture. Buckingham: Open University Press.
 
[13]  Van Dijk, T., A., (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse & Society, 4 (2): 249-283.
 
[14]  Van Dijk, T.A., (1997). Discourse Studies. A multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
 
[15]  Van Dijk, T., A., (1998). Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage
 
[16]  Fairclough, N., (1993). Critical Discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse and Society, 4: 133-168
 
[17]  Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997) “Critical Discourse Analysis,” in T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 258-84. London: SAGE.
 
[18]  Mc Combs, M.E. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda setting function of mass media. Public Opionion Quarterly, 36: 176-187.
 
[19]  Mc Combs, M. E., Shaw, D.L., & Weaver, D., (1997). Communication and Democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda setting theory. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
 
[20]  Lemke, J., L., (1995). Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.
 
[21]  Mc Quail, D. (1994 ). Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction (3rd. Edition). Thousand Oakes CA: Sage.
 
[22]  Entman, R. (1993) “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm,” Journal of Communication 43(4): 6-27.
 
[23]  Driedger, S.M., (2007). Risk and the media: a comparison of print and televised news stories of a Canadian drinking water risk event. Risk Analysis 27 (3), 775-786.
 
[24]  Viklund, M., (2004). Energy policy options—from the perspective of public attitudes and risk perceptions. Energy Policy 32, 1159-1171.
 
[25]  Davies, R., (2008). Civil society activism and waste management in Ireland: the Carranstown anti-incineration campaign. Land Use Policy 25 (2), 161-172.
 
[26]  Ungar, S., (1992). The rise and relative decline of global warming as a social problem. Sociological Quarterly 33 (4), 483-501.
 
[27]  Mazur, A., Lee, J., (1993). Sounding the global alarm: environmental issues in the US national news. Social Studies of Science 23, 681-720.
 
[28]  Major, A.M., Atwood, L.E., (2004). Environmental risks in the news: issues, sources, problems and values. Public Understanding of Science 13, 295-308.
 
[29]  Carvalho, A., Burgess, J., (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Analysis 25 (6), 1457-1469.
 
[30]  Trumbo, C. (1996) “Constructing Climate Change: Claims and Frames in US News Coverage of an Environmental Issue,” Public Understanding of Science 5: 269-73.
 
[31]  McComas, K., Shanahan, J., 1999. Telling stories about global climate change: measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research 26 (1), 30-57.
 
[32]  Weingart, P., Engels, A., Pansegrau, P., (2000). Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science 9, 261-283.
 
[33]  Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., McComas, K., (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication and Society 7 (3), 359-377.
 
[34]  O’Brien, K., 2006. Are we missing the point? Global environmental change as an issue of human security. Global Environmental Change Part A 16 (1), 1-3.
 
[35]  Dispensa, J.M., Brulle, R.J., (2003). Media’s social construction of environmental issues: focus on global warming: a comparative study. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23 (10), 74-105.
 
[36]  Mormont, M., Dasnoy, C., (1995). Source strategies and the mediatization of climate change. Media, Culture and Society 17 (1), 49-64.
 
[37]  Antilla, L., (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change 15, 338-352.
 
[38]  Boykoff, M.T., Boykoff, J.M., (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change 14, 125-136.
 
[39]  Boykoff, M.T., Boykoff, J.M., (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: a case study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38, 1190-1204.
 
[40]  Boykoff, M., (2007). Flogging a dead norm? media coverage of anthropogenic climate change in United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area 39, 470-481.
 
[41]  Berk, R.A., Schulman, D., (1995). Public perceptions of global warming. Climatic Change 29, 1-33.
 
[42]  O’Connor, R.E., Bord, R.J., Fisher, A., (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis 19, 461-471.
 
[43]  Leiserowitz, A., 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77, 45-72.
 
[44]  Bord, R.J., Fisher, A., O’Connor, R.E., 1998. Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Climate Research 11, 75-84.
 
[45]  Brechin, S., (2003). Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: the U.S. versus the world? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23, 106–134.
 
[46]  Aoyagi-Usui, M., Vinken, H., Kuribayashi, A., 2003. Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors: an international comparison. Human Ecology Review 10 (1), 23-31.
 
[47]  Ester, P., Vinken, H., Simoes, S., Aoyagi-Usui, M. (Eds.), (2003). Culture and Sustainability: A Cross-National Study of Cultural Diversity and environmental Priorities Among Mass Publics and Decision Makers. Dutch University Press.
 
[48]  Aoyagi-Usui, M., 2008. An analysis of the effective factors for promoting proenvironmental actions from the information gain and social capital point of view. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 1 (2), 37-50 (in Japanese).
 
[49]  Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
 
[50]  Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
 
[51]  Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1986-87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analysis, Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), pp. 1-8.
 
[52]  Diekmann, A. & Preisendörfer, P.(1992) Persönliches Umweltverhalten: die Diskrepanz zwischen Anspruch and Wirklichkeit, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 44(2) pp. 226-251.
 
[53]  Shen, J., & Saijo, T., (2008). Reexamining the relations between socio-demographic characteristics and individual environmental concern: Evidence from Shanghai data, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28 (1): 42-50
 
[54]  Friedemann P.(1996). The Nordlicht campaign-social marketing with a view to traffic reduction, In Facing the Challenge-Successful Climate Policies in European Cities (pp. 55-59) Berlin: European Academy of the Urban Environment.