Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2328-3912 ISSN (Online): 2328-3920 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/aees Editor-in-chief: Alejandro González Medina
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2014, 2(1), 20-24
DOI: 10.12691/aees-2-1-3
Open AccessArticle

Water Health Status in Lower Reaches of River Ganga, India

Chitralekha Sengupta1, Dipu Sukumaran1, , Dipanjali Barui1, Rita Saha1, Abhijit Chattopadhyay1, Asish Naskar1 and Suneel Dave2

1Central Pollution Control Board, Southend Conclave, Block, Rajdanga Main Road, Kolkata

2Central Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhavan, New Delhi, India

Pub. Date: January 20, 2014

Cite this paper:
Chitralekha Sengupta, Dipu Sukumaran, Dipanjali Barui, Rita Saha, Abhijit Chattopadhyay, Asish Naskar and Suneel Dave. Water Health Status in Lower Reaches of River Ganga, India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2014; 2(1):20-24. doi: 10.12691/aees-2-1-3

Abstract

Several factors affect microorganism survival and distribution in the aquatic environment including humans and animal populations. Present study assessed the influence of physicochemical factors on the distribution of presumptive coliform along the stretch of River Ganga in West Bengal, India. Nevertheless, Ganga water is polluted by drainage waste released from various urban and rural regions, agricultural and domestic wastes, industrial effluents and human activities. Drains discharge major portions of domestic wastes and untreated sewages, into the aquatic environment. Physico-Chemical factors affecting the survival of fecal microorganisms in the River Ganga as per the study included parameters like pH, conductivity, alkalinity, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD) etc. In Ganga some parameters were seen to vary dramatically along the stretch. All the stations had the total coliform counts of more than 500 and Tribeni being the upstream station had lower value for coliforms. Ganga Sagar was found to have the least count for coliforms because of high salinity.

Keywords:
River Ganga faecal coliform total coliform drains

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 2

References:

[1]  Afraz, A., 1994. The final report on the phenomenon of self-purification of the Pirbazar River. Gilan Fisheries Research Institute, pp: 1-127.
 
[2]  Afraz, A. and Gane, A., 1995. Biological and non-Biological Evaluation of the Hevigh River. Fisheries Research Centre of Gilan province, pp: 1-64.
 
[3]  Emtiyazi, G., 2000. Microbiology and control of Climate, water and wastewater. Mony Publications, pp: 1-200.
 
[4]  Malzad, F. and Fraz, A., 1995. Biological and non-biological evaluation of the Shafaroud River. Fisheries Research Centre of Gilan province, pp: 65.
 
[5]  Khatib, S., 2005. Determining the extent of coliform pollution of the Hevigh River located in the West of Maragheh Province and its effects on aquatic life. National Conference on Fisheries and sustainable development. Ghaemshahr Islamic Azad University, pp: 1-80.
 
[6]  Central Pollution Control Board, 1984. Basin Sub-Basin Inventory of Water Pollution-The Ganga Basin. Part II. ADSORBS/7/1982-83.
 
[7]  Mc Daniels, A.E., Bordner, R.H. Gartside, P.S. Haines, J.R. Conner, K.P. & Rankin, C.C. 1985. Holding effects on coliform enumeration in drinking water samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 50, pp: 755-762.
 
[8]  Sood, A., Singh, K.D. Pandey, P. and Sharma, S., 2008. Assessment of bacterial indicators and physicochemical parameters to investigate pollution status of Gangetic river system of Uttarakhand (India). Ecological Indicators, 8 (5), pp: 709-717.
 
[9]  EPA, 1997. Monitoring Guidance for Determining the Effectiveness of Nonpoint Source controls. EPOA 841-B-96-004. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
 
[10]  Young, K.D., and E.L. Thackston, 1999. Housing density and bacterial loading in urban streams. Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.), Singapore: Pearson Education.
 
[11]  Frenzel, S.A. and Couvillion, E.S., 2002. Feca1 indicator Bacteria in streams along a gradient of residential development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 28 (1), pp: 265-273.
 
[12]  Inamdar, S.P., Mostaghimi, S., Cook, M.N., Brannan, K.M., and McClellen, P.W., 2002. A Long-term, Watershed-scale, Evaluation of the Impacts of Animal Waste BMPs on Indicator Bacteria Concentrations. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38 (3), pp: 819-833.
 
[13]  Steve H., Damon P., Michelle W., Gopal P., Rajesh K.M., Veer B.M., Catherine P. and Timothy E.F. 2013. Sewage pollution of the River Ganga: an ongoing case study in Varanasi, India, River Systems. 20/3-4, pp: 157-167.
 
[14]  Basant R. 2013. Pollution and Conservation of Ganga Riverin Modern India International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3, (4).
 
[15]  Anjum P., Rajesh K., Pratima and Rajat K. 2013. Physio-Chemical Properties of the Water of River Ganga at Kanpur. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 3 (4), pp: 134-37.
 
[16]  APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (21th Ed). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
 
[17]  Central Pollution Control Board. 2008. Guidelines for Water Quality Management. Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi.
 
[18]  Basu, S., Banerjee, T., Manna, P., Bhattacharyya, B. and Guha, B., 2012. Influence of Physicochemical Parameters on the Abundance of Coliform Bacteria in an Industrial Site of the Hooghly River, India. Proc. Zool Soc. DOI 10.1007/s 12595-012-0054-z.
 
[19]  Lenihan, H.S., Oliver, J.S. Oakden, M.D. and Stephenson, M.D., 1990. Intense localized benthic pollution around McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 21, pp: 422-430.
 
[20]  Murdoch, T. and Cheo, M., 1996. Streamkeeper’s Field Guide. Adopt-A-Stream Foundation.
 
[21]  Marino, R.P. and Gannon, J.J., 1991. Survival of faecal coliform and faecal Streptococci in storm drains sediment. Wat. Res., 25 (9), pp: 1089-1098.
 
[22]  Cantwell, R.E., Raymond, E. and Hofmann, R., 2008. Inactivation of indigenous coliform bacteria in unfiltered surface water by ultraviolet light.
 
[23]  Anderson, I.C., Rodes, M.W. and Kator, H.I., 1979. Sublethal stress in Escherichia coli Escherichia coli: A function of salinity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 38, pp: 1147-1152.
 
[24]  Sayeda, M.A., Z.S. Shawky, F. Mohammed, M. Mohammed and Nabil H.A., 2011. The influence of agro industrial effluents on River Nile pollution, Journal of Advanced Research, 2 (1): 85-95.