Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2328-3912 ISSN (Online): 2328-3920 Website: Editor-in-chief: Alejandro González Medina
Open Access
Journal Browser
Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2021, 9(1), 53-57
DOI: 10.12691/aees-9-1-7
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Management Studies on Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight of Maize Caused by Rhizoctonia Solani F.SP. Sasakii

Radhajeyalakshmi Raju1, , Sethuraman Kandhasamy2, Lakshmi Narayanan Subramanian1 and Arivudai Nambi Marisamy1

1Maize Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Vagarai-624613

2Directorate of student’s Welfare, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003

Pub. Date: November 26, 2020

Cite this paper:
Radhajeyalakshmi Raju, Sethuraman Kandhasamy, Lakshmi Narayanan Subramanian and Arivudai Nambi Marisamy. Comparative Management Studies on Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight of Maize Caused by Rhizoctonia Solani F.SP. Sasakii. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2021; 9(1):53-57. doi: 10.12691/aees-9-1-7


Bioassay of biocontrol agents and fungicides against Maize Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani showed inhibition. Among the biocontrol agents, Bacillus subtilis and among the fungicides Hexaconazole was found to be effective under field conditions with the percent disease incidence of 2.25% and 3.00% respectively over control 10.45%. Seed treatment (4g/kg) and soil application (2.5kg/ha) of Bacillus subtilis recorded 78.46% reduction in sheath blight incidence and highest grain yield of 6.7t/ha. Foliar spraying of Hexaconazole (0.2%) showed 71.30% reduction and grain yield of 6.4t/ha. Hence, seed treatment and soil application of Bacillus subtilis is considered to be effective against BLSB under field condition. Seed treatment and soil application of Bacillus subtilis, Foliar spraying of Hexaconazole may be recommended for Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight of Maize.

Rhizoctonia solani banded leaf and sheath blight biocontrol agents fungicides Bacillus subtilis Trichoderma asperellam

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Chowdhury, S.P., Dietel, K., Rändler, M., Schmid, M., Junge, H., Borriss, R., Hartmann, A., Grosch, R. (2013). Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 on lettuce growth and health under pathogen pressure and its impact on the rhizosphere bacterial community. PLoS One 8: e68818v.
[2]  Payak, M.M and Renfro, B.L., (1966). Diseases of maize new to India. Indian Phytopathol. Soc.Bull. 3: 14-18.
[3]  Singh, B..M, Sharma,Y.R. (1976). Evaluation of maize germplasm to banded leaf and sheath blight and assessment of yield loss. Indian Phytopatho., l 29: 129-132.
[4]  Lal, S., Baruah, P., Butchaiah, K. (1980). Assessment of yield losses in maize cultivars due to banded sclerotial disease. Indian Phytopathol., 33: 440-443
[5]  Lal, S., Butchaiah, K., Baruah, P. (1985). Comparative efficacy of some fungicides and antibiotics in control of banded sclerotial disease of maize. Pesticides 19: 17-19.
[6]  Nene, Y. L. and Thapliyal, P. N. (1993). Fungicides in plant disease control. Oxford and IBH Publication Company. New Delhi. 507 p.
[7]  Mc Kinney, H. H. (1923). Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helminthosporium sativum. 1. Agric. Res. 26: 195-210.
[8]  Riker AJ, Riker RS (1936). Introduction of research on plant disease. St Lousi, John Swift Co, p 117.
[9]  Ahuja, S.C. and Payak, M.M. (1983). A rating scale for 80 Indian Phytopathology banded leaf and sheath blight of maize. Indian Phytopath, 36: 338-340.
[10]  Meena, R. L., Rathore, R. S. and Mathur, K. (2003). Efficacy of bio control agents against Rhizoctonia solani f. sp. sasakii causing banded leaf and sheath blight of maize. Mycol. Plant Pathol., 33: 310-312.
[11]  Sharma, G. and Saxena, S.C. (2002). Integrated management of banded leaf and sheath blight of maize caused by Rhizoctonia solani (Kuhn). Advances in Plant Sciences 15: 107-113.
[12]  Shuang Wang, Lei Sun, Wu Zhang, Fengqin Chi, Xiaoyu Hao, Jingyang Bian and Yonggang Li. (2020). Bacillus velezensis BM21, a potential and efficient biocontrol agent in control of corn stalk rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 30: 9.
[13]  Fira, D., Dimkić, I., Berić, T., Lozo, J., Stanković, S. (2018) Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J.Biotechnol., 285: 44-55.
[14]  Guetsky R., Shtienberg, D., Elad, Y., Fischer, E., Dinoor, A. (2002). Improving biological control by combining biocontrol agents each with several mechanisms of disease suppression. Phytopathol., 92: 976-985.
[15]  Jamil Shafi, Hui Tian and Mingshan Ji. (2017). Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review, Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 31:3, 446-459.
[16]  Wu, Y., Wang, S.F., Chen, X., Ren, Z.L., Li,A., Zhou, Y.C., Tu, Z.G., Guo, W.L., Sun, Y., Cai, Y. (2019). Fermentation conditions and preliminary study on antibacterial properties of Bacillus subtillis HAINUP40. Genom Appl Biol.
[17]  Amran Muisa and Arcadio J. Quimiob. (2006). Biological control of banded leaf and sheath blight disease (Rhizoctonia solani kuhn) in corn with formulated Bacillus subtilis BR23. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science 7(1), 2006: 1-7.
[18]  McMullen, M.P. and H.A. Lamey. (2000). Seed treatment for disease control. North Dakota State University. NDSU Extension Service. 11 pp.
[19]  Liu, Z.L. and J.B. Sinclair. (1987). Bacillus subtilis as a potential biological control agent for Rhizoctonia root rot of soybean. Phytopathology 77: 1687 (Abstract).
[20]  Tschen, J.S.M.(1987). Control of Rhizoctonia solani by Bacillus subtilis. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan.28: 483-493.
[21]  Turner, J.T. and P.A. Backman.(1991). Factors relating to peanut yield increase after seed treatment with Bacillus subtilis. Plant Dis. 75: 347-353.
[22]  Moussa, T.A.A. (2002). Studies on biological control of sugarbeet pathogen Rhizoctonia Solani. Kuhn. J. Biol. Sci. 2(12): 800-804.
[23]  Skidmore AM and Dickinson CH 1976. Colony interaction and hyphal interference between Septoria nodorum and phylloplane fungi. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 66: 57-64.