Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2328-3912 ISSN (Online): 2328-3920 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/aees Editor-in-chief: Alejandro González Medina
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2020, 8(6), 396-401
DOI: 10.12691/aees-8-6-10
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Analysis of Exhaust Emission from CI Engine Running on 20% Blends of Different Biodiesels

Rajesh Dudi1, , Vineet Kumar2 and Sunil Kumar Mahla3

1Research Scholar, I. K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, India

2Department of Automobile Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India

3Department of Mechanical Engineering, I. K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, Hoshiarpur Campus, India

Pub. Date: September 15, 2020

Cite this paper:
Rajesh Dudi, Vineet Kumar and Sunil Kumar Mahla. Comparative Analysis of Exhaust Emission from CI Engine Running on 20% Blends of Different Biodiesels. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2020; 8(6):396-401. doi: 10.12691/aees-8-6-10

Abstract

Taking into account the rising cost of non-renewable energy source and ecological contamination, elective fuel is required. Looking for such fuel, biodiesel has drawn everybody's consideration. Biodiesel might be an enormous substitute for a non-renewable energy source. The current paper speaks to a relative examination of the biodiesel Karanja, Mahua and Jatropha in comparison with pure diesel (D100). The three biodiesels were extracted from two-step transesterification process. Then 20 percentage blends of the biodiesels were used in CI engine separately at varying load. The Results were determined and afterwards compared on the ground of performance and emission from the engine. The outcomes demonstrate that the carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC), CO2 and smoke created by K20 (karanja 20% blend), J20 (jatropha 20% blend) and M20 (mahua 20% blend) are lower than diesel (D100). The brake thermal proficiency (BTE) for all the three biodiesels was found lower as comparison with D100. The brake specific fuel consumption was lowest for D100. Additionally, K20, J20 and M20 produce more NOx than diesel D100. Likewise, EGT was found highest for D100.

Keywords:
biodiesel emission performance karanja Jatropha and Mahua

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  M. Suresh, C. P. Jawahar, and A. Richard, ‘A review on biodiesel production, combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of non-edible oils in variable compression ratio diesel engine using biodiesel and its blends’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 92, no. March, pp. 38-49, 2018.
 
[2]  S. Rezania, B. Oryani, J. Park, and B. Hashemi, ‘Review on transesterification of non-edible sources for biodiesel production with a focus on economic aspects, fuel properties and by-product applications’, Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 201, no. October, p. 112155, 2019.
 
[3]  O. S. Stamenkovi, V. B. Veljkovi, and I. B. Bankovi, ‘Biodiesel production from non-edible plant oils’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 16, pp. 3621-3647, 2012.
 
[4]  P. K. Sahoo and L. M. Das, ‘Process optimization for biodiesel production from Jatropha, Karanja and Polanga oils’, Fuel, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 1588-1594, 2009.
 
[5]  A. K. Tiwari, A. Kumar, and H. R. Ã, ‘Biodiesel production from jatropha oil (Jatropha curcas) with high free fatty acids: An optimized process’, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 31, pp. 569-575, 2007.
 
[6]  D. Nguyen, C. Tongurai, K. Prasertsit, and A. Kumar, ‘A novel two-step transesterification process catalyzed by homogeneous base catalyst in the first step and heterogeneous acid catalyst in the second step’, Fuel Process. Technol., vol. 168, no. August, pp. 97-104, 2017.
 
[7]  P. Taylor, H. Manjunath, O. Hebbal, and H. R. K, ‘Process Optimization for Biodiesel Production from Simarouba, Mahua and Waste Cooking Oils Process Optimization for Biodiesel Production from Simarouba, Mahua, and Waste Cooking Oils’, Int. J. Green Energy, pp. 37-41, 2014.
 
[8]  V. Narula, A. Thakur, A. Uniyal, S. Kalra, and S. Jain, ‘Process parameter optimization of low temperature transesterification of algae-Jatropha Curcas oil blend’, Energy, 2016.
 
[9]  M. M. Rashed, M. A. Kalam, H. H. Masjuki, M. Mofijur, M. G. Rasul, and N. W. M. Zulkifli, ‘Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with palm, jatropha, and moringa oil methyl ester’, Ind. Crops Prod., vol. 79, pp. 70-76, 2016.
 
[10]  A. K. Yadav, M. E. Khan, A. M. Dubey, and A. Pal, ‘Performance and emission characteristics of a transportation diesel engine operated with non-edible vegetable oils biodiesel’, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 8, pp. 236-244, 2016.
 
[11]  B. S. Chauhan, N. Kumar, and H. M. Cho, ‘A study on the performance and emission of a diesel engine fueled with Jatropha biodiesel oil and its blends’, Energy, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 616-622, 2011.
 
[12]  A. K. Agarwal and K. Rajamanoharan, ‘Experimental investigations of performance and emissions of Karanja oil and its blends in a single cylinder agricultural diesel engine’, Appl. Energy, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 106-112, 2009.
 
[13]  J. V Tirkey, A. Kumar, and S. K. Shukla, ‘Comparative analysis of engine performance and emission characteristics of different biodiesels’, vol. 7269, 2018.
 
[14]  B. Deepanraj, M. Srinivas, N. Arun, G. Sankaranarayanan, and P. Abdul Salam, ‘Comparison of jatropha and karanja biofuels on their combustion characteristics’, Int. J. Green Energy, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 1231-1237, 2017.
 
[15]  S. Godiganur, C. H. Suryanarayana Murthy, and R. P. Reddy, ‘6BTA 5.9 G2-1 Cummins engine performance and emission tests using methyl ester mahua (Madhuca indica) oil/diesel blends’, Renew. Energy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2172-2177, 2009.
 
[16]  B. De and R. S. Panua, ‘An experimental study on performance and emission characteristics of vegetable oil blends with diesel in a direct injection variable compression ignition engine’, Procedia Eng., vol. 90, pp. 431-438, 2014.
 
[17]  I. M. Monirul et al., ‘Assessment of performance, emission and combustion characteristics of palm, jatropha and Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel blends’, Fuel, vol. 181, pp. 985-995, 2016.
 
[18]  S. K. Mahla, A. Dhir, V. Singla, and P. Rosha, ‘Investigations on environmental emissions characteristics of CI engine fuelled with castor biodiesel blends’, J. Environ. Biol., vol. 39, pp. 353-357, 2018.
 
[19]  R. S. Kumar, K. Sureshkumar, and R. Velraj, ‘Combustion, performance and emission characteristics of an unmodified diesel engine fueled with Manilkara Zapota Methyl Ester and its diesel blends’, Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 139, no. September 2016, pp. 196-202, 2018.
 
[20]  V. Kumar and R. Kumar, ‘The effect of operating parameters on performance and emissions of DI diesel engine fuelled with Jatropha biodiesel’, Fuel, vol. 278, no. February, p. 118256, 2020.
 
[21]  P. Verma and M. P. Sharma, ‘Comparative analysis of effect of methanol and ethanol on Karanja biodiesel production and its optimisation’, Fuel, vol. 180, pp. 164-174, 2016.
 
[22]  H. K. Amarnath and P. Prabhakaran, ‘International Journal of Green Energy A Study on the Thermal Performance and Emissions of a Variable Compression Ratio Diesel Engine Fuelled with Karanja Biodiesel and the Optimization of Parameters Based on Experimental Data’, no. July 2013, pp. 37-41, 2011.
 
[23]  A. Nalgundwar, B. Paul, and S. Kumar, ‘Comparison of performance and emissions characteristics of DI CI engine fueled with dual biodiesel blends of palm and jatropha’, FUEL, vol. 173, no. 2016, pp. 172-179, 2017.
 
[24]  S. Gangil, R. Singh, P. Bhavate, B. Modhera, and D. Bhagat, ‘Evaluation of engine performance and emission with methyl ester of Karanja oil’, Perspect. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 241-243, 2016.
 
[25]  D. Das, A. Kumar, and A. Yadav, ‘Evaluation of performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a CI engine fueled with karanja biodiesel and diethyl ether blends’, Biofuels, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 89-94, 2018.
 
[26]  C. Swaminathan and J. Sarangan, ‘A comprehensive study on reduction of NOx emission applying EGR technique in a diesel engine using biodiesel (POME) as fuel with ether-based additives’, Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 834-843, 2017.
 
[27]  A. K. Agarwal, A. Shrivastava, and R. K. Prasad, ‘Evaluation of toxic potential of particulates emitted from Jatropha biodiesel fuelled engine’, Renew. Energy, vol. 99, pp. 564-572, 2016.
 
[28]  K. J. S. Gill, H. C. Lim, H. M. Cho, S. K. Mahla, B. S. Chauhan, and A. Dhir, ‘Influence of EGR on the simultaneous reduction of NOx-smoke emissions trade-off under CNG-biodiesel dual fuel engine’, Energy, vol. 152, no. x, pp. 303-312, 2018.
 
[29]  B. R. Hosamani and V. V. Katti, ‘Experimental analysis of combustion characteristics of CI DI VCR engine using mixture of two biodiesel blend with diesel’, Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 769-777, 2018.